Are Indian Bowlers Really Struggling, Or Has Cricket Become Too Easy For Batters?

Indian cricket team players in second T20I vs West Indies in Ranchi.© X/@BCCI
The Indian cricket team is currently facing a dearth of quality bowlers. The ongoing matches against West Indies are enough to substantiate this claim. There is no denying the fact that the Indian bowling attack, especially in the absence of Jasprit Bumrah, needs a lot of improvement, but are we judging the budding bowlers correctly? At least the economy rate alone can't provide the best picture of a bowler's potential, especially at a time when nearly all pitches and playing conditions are batting-friendly.
At a time when the crowd walks into the stadium to witness boundaries, match organisers are also making sure that fans do not go back home disappointed. And they do this by preparing tracks conducive to high scoring.
After multiple recent changes in the playing rules and the conditions offered for games, one could easily undertand that there is a massive bias towards batting, which is eventually leading the game of cricket towards a huge imbalance between bat and ball.
So, are the Indian bowlers truly victims of that?
Well, one cannot come to that conclusion easily. But the playing conditions are definitely hampering bowling. Having said that, we should also admit that poor lines and lengths should be criticised, irrespective of the pitches on offer or the results such deliveries produce.
If we talk about Indian bowlers specifically, it is a mixture of poor bowling as well as tough conditions.
Take the second West Indies T20I in Ranchi, for example. Mayank Yadav troubled the West Indies batters with his extreme pace and claimed two wickets in his very first over against them. He picked up a total of three wickets, with the final one coming off a 149.5 kmph delivery that knocked over Rovman Powell in the blink of an eye.
What. A. Delivery \|/ Express pace from Mayank Yadav Updates https://t.co/mZlyaWZsoe #TeamIndia | #INDvWI | @mflone_ https://t.co/Lyd3SOPwuN
— BCCI (@BCCI) October 9, 2026
Sounds like an amazing spell from Mayank, right?
In case you didn't follow the game, you might be surprised by the fact that Mayank ended up leaking 36 runs in his three overs. He couldn't even bowl his final one as West Indies reached home in 18.3 overs by chasing 250, their highest successful chase in T20I history.
While expensive figures never suggest that a bowler has bowled well, they also fail to explain the real reason behind a poor outing. Was it due to the belter of a pitch, the wet outfield, or the poor performance of the bowler himself?
What. A. Delivery \|/ Express pace from Mayank Yadav Updates https://t.co/mZlyaWZsoe #TeamIndia | #INDvWI | @mflone_ https://t.co/Lyd3SOPwuN
— BCCI (@BCCI) October 9, 2026
After the Ranchi T20I, even India head coach Gautam Gambhir frankly pointed out that there needs to be something in the game for bowlers.
"They aren't foreign bowlers; their careers are also at stake. They also worked hard to sit in this dressing room; it's not like they didn't work hard. They have also worked hard. So if there is an even competition, it will be good, and better cricket will be seen," Gambhir said.
So what should Indian bowlers do? Should they keep their hopes pinned on cricket organisers, or keep surrendering themselves in front of powerful opposition batters on belter tracks?
Well, the following statement from Gambhir certainly provides the best answer. They need to improve and find a way to counter this issue.
"We are a world-champion team, so we want to keep improving. And obviously, these are tough conditions to bowl in; we know that. On flat wickets, with the dew, it is tough, but we need to figure out a way to try and stop the opposition, especially when they lost two wickets in the first over, and three in the first six," concluded Gambhir.
Featured Video Of The Day
Neeraj Chopra Wins Silver, Yashvir Singh Bronze As India Seal Double Podium In CWG Javelin
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.