The Jerusalem PostEmbassy warns Britain of 'consequences' for providing drones to Ukraine used to attack RussiaRTP DesportoPor 35,9 milhões de euros. Amar Dedic troca o Benfica pelo NewcastleBollywood HungamaEXCLUSIVE: Excel Entertainment teaming up with Kanika Dhillon for an intense thrillerוואלהמפוקח מין ברמת מסוכנות גבוהה נעצר בירושלים בחשד להפרת צו הפיקוחInquirer EntertainmentAnne Curtis assures she’s ok amid concerns over lump on her neckInquirerAdiong: Senators can judge evidence, witness better if they’re presentUOLExplosão em central elétrica da Síria deixa três mortosColliderThe Year’s Biggest Horror Sensation Officially Hits Its First Real Speed BumpThe South AfricanRassie: What concerns the Springboks about the All BlacksScreen RantGTA 6 Official Gameplay Shown In Unexpected New TrailerIl Sole 24 OreMancano 315mila esperti di Ai: ecco dove le imprese faticano di più a trovarliThe Sydney Morning HeraldWhat my week as a content creator for a Temu sloth taught me
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Your say: week beginning August 17

Translate

From the Editors

Notes from The Conversation newsroom

A woman concentrates on her phone screen.
ArtMarie/Getty Images, The Conversation

Every day, we publish a selection of your emails in our newsletter. We’d love to hear from you, you can email us at yoursay@theconversation.edu.au.

Monday August 17

“We have long wondered why there has never been any change to politicians being paid when they do not attend parliament when it is sitting. Ordinary Australians would lose their jobs if they did not attend as often as some Queensland pollies. We understand that there should be personal and sick leave but not leave for politicking. When parliament sits we feel all MPs should be present to represent the people who have voted them in. Is this something the Conversation could take up through their pages?”

Danny and Kerrie Green, NSW

“The new arrangement for forcing big tech to pay Australian media is better than nothing, but excluding AI and risking further concentration of our media landscape means it’s not all positive. Perhaps even more important in the long run is how Meta pays for controversial content. Sites have rules about dealing with undesirable content; the question is whether their payment systems undermine them.”

Gary Barnes, NSW

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 231,400 academics and researchers from 5,589 institutions.

View the original on The Conversation

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.