PunchState police: 28 assemblies approve, Tinubu’s assent nextSky TG24Midterm, Chris Pappas sarà il primo senatore Usa dichiaratamente gayThe Jerusalem PostIsrael, Kazakhstan sign agreement to prevent double taxation following lengthy negotiationsInquirerPolice hunt 2 suspects who escaped Bacoor shootoutsInquirer EntertainmentLiza Soberano, H.E.R’s ‘BRB’ earns two Hollywood Music in Media Awards nominationsZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioABC NewsElection 2026 live results: Dem Lance Bottoms projected to be 1st Black woman gov.DeadlineMidterm Elections: Democrats To Take Control Of The House Of RepresentativesDaily MailGOP set to lose the House in midterms 'massacre' as country turns on Trump: Live updatesEl ComercioLa demócrata Keisha Lance Bottoms de Georgia será la primera gobernadora negra de EE.UU., según proyeccionesObservador DesportoViolência importada? Só pela PSP, responde Acampada do PortoIl Fatto QuotidianoReferendum in Virginia: cancellato dalla Costituzione il divieto dei matrimoni gay
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Blow for gig economy as Uber loses $81m High Court battle

Translate

Uber will have to pay more than $81 million in payroll taxes to the state of New South Wales after the High Court dismissed the rideshare giant’s appeal arguing it was a “payment collection agent” and that funds sent to drivers were not wages.

In a decision that put an end to a years-long legal battle on Wednesday, the High Court ruled the NSW payroll tax should be imposed on Uber fares for the period between the 2015 and 2020 financial years that the case centred on.

Uber has lost a landmark legal battle over payroll tax in Australia.AP Photo/Richard Drew

The ruling, in which one of the seven justices dissented, found that Uber’s contracts with drivers meant that there was a legal obligation for them to transport a rider once they’d accepted a request. In the eyes of the relevant law, this meant payments to the drivers for the rides they completed were “deemed to be wages”, the justices ruled.

In 2024, the NSW Supreme Court ruled that Uber was not liable for the payroll tax bill that Revenue NSW had sought. The court found Uber collected payments for its driver partners, rather than paying their wages. That ruling was overturned by the NSW Court of Appeal last year, a decision that Uber subsequently appealed to the High Court.

Wednesday’s High Court decision is expected to have larger ramifications for both Uber and the broader gig economy as the ruling may set a precedent for hundreds of millions of other transactions if replicated over more time and in other states.

The decision is understood to have blindsided Uber. The rideshare giant had such confidence in its appeal succeeding that it made no provisions for the potential $81.5 million liability when lodging its financial results with the regulator earlier this year. 

Uber has long insisted its drivers aren’t employees but contractors, and that it isn’t a transport provider but simply matches contractors with riders – an argument it has previously leant on in questions over driver misconduct, minimum wages and potential discrimination complaints.

Uber was contacted for comment.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Elias VisontayElias Visontay is a National Consumer Affairs Reporter at The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.Connect via email.

View the original on The Sydney Morning Herald →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.