The Jerusalem PostIsrael must stop demanding loyalty confessions from Arab citizens - opinionBollywood HungamaBREAKING: Dhurandhar to OPEN Indian Panorama at 57th IFFI Goa 2026 while Ramayana to open BRICS segment; The Kerala Story 2 enters PRESTIGIOUS International CompetitionInquirerChua on defense wanting longer trial: We call it ‘masochism’Sky TG24Spazio e difesa, Kubilius visita lo stabilimento ArgotecBillboardChris Colfer Says He’s in Talks for ‘Glee’-boot, Shares What He Thinks Kurt Is Doing Now (Hint: It Involves Chappell Roan)20 Minuten«Es war ein Traum»: So war euer Tag mit der Microsoft-StörungZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFGlobal NewsAvril Lavigne announces birth of 1st child: ‘Princess has arrived’NMERosalía makes history with Album Of The Year award win at Latin Grammys and performs ‘Lux’ medleyGMA News22-anyos na babaeng angkas, nasawi nang mabangga ng delivery van ang sinasakyan niyang motorsikloNU.nlNieuwe Sint mogelijk uitgelekt: 'topfavoriet' Gijs Naber bij repetitie intochtESPNConnelly previews 32 high-stakes games on a make-or-break weekend
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, November 13, 2026

Can HMRC read your ChatGPT history? Here’s what the new rules mean

Translate

HMRC could snoop on taxpayers' AI chat history as the tax authority expands its power to demand digital information.

Currently, HMRC can ask for computer records when they need to investigate whether a taxpayer has paid enough tax.

But under changes to the law on computer records that are expected to come into force in May, the tax authority is set to gain the ability to inspect how tax figures are produced including the software and automated systems behind them.

The changes will mean third parties, including AI platforms and software providers may be asked to share taxpayer information.

Those who do not respond to HMRC’s requests for information face a £300 fine, while taxpayers who do not report inaccuracies are liable for up to £3,000.

HMRC has said it wants information on how relevant tax figures have been produced

HMRC has said it wants information on how relevant tax figures have been produced (Getty/iStock)

Seb Maley, CEO of tax insurance provider Qdos, commented on the proposed changes and said: “As more taxpayers and businesses put their trust in AI to help manage their tax affairs, HMRC is making sure it isn't left behind. It wants to know not just what tax figure a system produces, but how it arrived at that number.

"This makes choosing trusted, reputable experts more important than ever. Businesses and taxpayers need confidence that the technology they're relying on is accurate, transparent and compliant. Simply trusting a system to get things right won't be enough if HMRC comes knocking.

"AI and automation might make managing tax affairs easier on the face of it, but it doesn’t remove responsibility from the taxpayer or business liable for tax. Ultimately, if something goes wrong, these parties will face questions from HMRC."

Trading 212 logo

Invest at least £100 in Stocks or ETFs of your choice. Get fractional shares worth £50!

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

Invest at least £100 in Stocks or ETFs of your choice. Get fractional shares worth £50!

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

HMRC has said it wants information on “how relevant tax figures have been produced including where they are generated using software or automated processes to support more accurate tax reporting and strengthen compliance.”

This proposal raises the question whether prompt histories and chatbot conversations used to prepare tax calculations within AI agents like Copilot, ChatGPT, and Claude become disclosable if they formed part of the tax calculation process.

However, Anne Strickland, of the Taxpayers’ Alliance campaign group, said it would be “deeply intrusive” to request AI conversations.

She told the Telegraph: “HMRC already has sweeping powers, and expanding them further risks trampling over the privacy of ordinary Britons.”

An HMRC spokesperson said: “This is about updating our existing information powers to reflect how tax information is now stored and processed digitally. It is not about going through everyone’s use of large language models. We can only request information where we already have a lawful basis to do so.”

View the original on The Independent →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.