PunchHow Moniepoint customers can check eligibility for FG’s ₦50,000 relief supportThe Jerusalem PostIran's IRGC says two tankers and tugboat caught fire in Strait of HormuzBollywood HungamaCONFIRMED: Sunny Deol makes a ROCKING entry as Lord Hanuman during Ramayana’s end creditsInquirerOSG: Senate didn’t amend Charter in revised impeach rule한겨레인천시 내년도 예산안 15조9천억원…올해 예산보다 3.75% 증가CNN TürkÜç ülkeden ortak savunma hamlesi! Mekke Anlaşması Meclis'teZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFComplete SportsUCL: ‘A Lot To Learn’ – Arteta Critical Of Arsenal Performance Despite Win Over Slavia PragueWirtualna PolskaZłe wieści dla Donalda Tuska. Polacy zabrali głos w nowym sondażuHet Laatste Nieuws🎧 “Daar lachte Ivan Leko eens mee”: HLN Voetbalpodcast blikt terug op PSV-Club Brugge경향신문[단독]유해화학물질 다루는 반도체 실습…학생 안전교육은 공통 매뉴얼에 의존سكاي نيوز عربيةفضيحة انتخابية في كاليفورنيا.. اتهام 28 شخصا بالاحتيال
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 5, 2026

‘Denied full refund’ after Goa-Delhi flight cancelled during Covid, man wins Rs 18,000

Translate

A 21-year-old passenger has won Rs 18,150 from an airline after his Goa-Delhi flight was cancelled during the Covid-19 lockdown. The passenger had paid Rs 6,600 for two tickets, but the airline allegedly refunded only Rs 3,150, deducting the remaining amount towards cancellation and GST charges.

Ruling on the matter, a Haryana consumer commission found that the airline had failed to produce any notification or government direction justifying the deduction or establish the basis for withholding the amount. President Nagender Singh Kadian, along with Dr Tripti Pannu and Dr Vijender Singh of the Rohtak District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, allowed the man’s complaint on October 28.

“In view of the directions issued by the Supreme Court and the relevant directions of the competent authorities regarding refund of air-ticket amounts in cases arising out of the Covid-19 lockdown, the complainant (man) was entitled to refund of the amount paid by him. Accordingly, the opposite party (airline) is liable to refund the remaining amount due to the complainant, along with interest thereon,” the order read.

Flight cancelled, refund withheld

The man claimed that his brother booked two airline tickets online from Goa to New Delhi to travel on June 22, 2020 and paid Rs 6,600 for the same. He added that the said flight was cancelled by the airline following a lockdown order by the central government. It was submitted that as per the direction of the Supreme Court and government rules, the complainant was entitled to a full refund regarding cancellation of said ticket.

However, he alleged that despite repeatedly approaching the airline, he did not receive the full refund. He also claimed that he sent emails requesting the refund and also issued a legal notice, but the amount was not returned.

Aggrieved, he moved the commission seeking refund of Rs 6,600 and Rs 50,000 on account of harassment and litigation expenses from the airline. He was represented through advocate Naveen Singh.

Airline’s defence

The airline, through advocate Ashok Dhankar, submitted that the complaint was liable to be dismissed as it had already partially refunded the ticket amount in accordance with its fare norms.

Story continues below this ad

It stated that it had refunded Rs 3,150 to the passenger’s bank account on August 11, 2021, after deducting cancellation charges and GST. It also sought dismissal of the complaint.

‘Passenger entitled to full refund’

The commission found that the airline refunded only Rs 3,150 in August 2021. It referred to the Supreme Court order of 2020 and the subsequent Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) circular dated October 7, 2020, which dealt with refunds for air tickets cancelled during the lockdown.

“Wherein the lockdown imposed nationwide by the Government of India was from March 25, 2020 to May 24, 2020 and airlines were directed to refund the amount by March 21, 2021,” the commission noted the rules regarding the refund at the time of lockdown.

The commission, hence, held that the passenger was entitled to the remaining refund, along with interest. It also found that the airline had not placed on record any notification or document justifying the deduction of the remaining amount, nor any direction or notification issued by the Government of India authorising such deduction.

Story continues below this ad

It directed the airline to refund the remaining Rs 3,150 and pay Rs 10,000 as compensation for deficiency in service and Rs 5,000 towards litigation expenses within 30 days.

Takeaway

This ruling highlights that when an airline deducts cancellation charges from a refund, it must establish the applicable rules and provide evidence justifying the deduction.

Consumers facing similar grievances may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states (Haryana: 1800-180-2087) or dial the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Don’t miss out on these stories:

Rs 20 accident coverage turns into battle after wife’s death, man secures Rs 2 lakh payout

Story continues below this ad

LIC rejects claim over hidden diabetes, widow wins Rs 3 lakh insurance battle after 13 years

Haryana boy wins Rs 18,000 from mobile phone manufacturer over ‘defective handset’

View the original on The Indian Express →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.