ESPN DeportesAtlético vs Real Madrid: ¿Cuál es el derbi que más sorprendió a Mou?The Jerusalem PostHoldout juror in Lindsay Clancy trial hires high-profile counsel following mistrial controversyESPNUnwavering confidence in Loveland, concern for Pitts and more Week 2 insightsוואלהF-16 הוזנק בעקבות חדירת מטוס למרחב האווירי ליד קמפ דייווידInquirerCampus shooter ‘planned attack, warned classmates’한겨레‘발등에 불’ 다카이치 일 총리, 시진핑에 앞서 트럼프와 만남…왜?SözcüTrump şimdi de 'yapay zeka'nın ismine savaş açtıWirtualna PolskaGroźby w sieci wobec premiera. Policja zatrzymała mężczyznęSportstarAsian Games Live Updates, September 20: Elavenil, Sonam in action as women's 10m air rifle final begins — Latest scores and newsBBC NewsTwo killed in 'massive' Ukrainian drone attack on Moscow region, says Russia매일경제“코스피 이것 때문에 버텼는데, 어쩌나”…삼전닉스 35조 자사주 매입 내달 종료CumhuriyetTrump'ın yeni gündemi: 'Yapay zeka ismi değiştirilsin' dedi, anket başlattı
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 20, 2026

‘Sell your wife’: Delhi's killer couple who murdered executive face fraud probe

Translate

‘Sell your wife’: Delhi's killer couple who murdered executive Yuvraj Singh Manchanda under scanner for frauds worth crores

Anya Vats (L), Victim Yuvraj Singh Manchanda (R)

NEW DELHI: “Sell your wife/do anything, just repay this,” read a WhatsApp message cited in an FIR filed by a senior executive who allegedly lost over Rs 1.2 crore in a fraud racket involving Yuvraj Singh Manchanda’s former colleague Anya Vats and her partner Sanyam Sachdeva.

Police are now probing whether Manchanda, who was allegedly killed by the couple in Gurgaon on Sept 6, had learnt about their alleged activities.

Fake ED notice allegedly used to trap schoolmate

Police have found that the couple allegedly targeted people close to them, including a former schoolmate of Sachdeva, who was duped of over Rs 1.2 crore after receiving a fake Enforcement Directorate notice. The cheating case was registered at Parliament Street police station this August.The complainant, a senior vice-president at a non-banking financial company that is a subsidiary of a public sector bank, told police that the extortion began in Sept 2024, when he received the fraudulent notice on WhatsApp allegedly involving an acquaintance.According to the complainant, Sachdeva, a former schoolmate, along with Vats, allegedly claimed to have high-level government connections and offered to settle the matter.

The duo allegedly also used fabricated notices in the name of the Union home ministry, citing fake cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, to coerce him into transferring money.

Rs 1.2 crore transferred, then another Rs 26 crore demanded

The complainant allegedly transferred over Rs 1.2 crore primarily to Vats’ bank account, using his personal savings, loans and family borrowings.Vats later allegedly demanded another Rs 26 crore, claiming that Rs 13.8 crore had been paid to government agencies on his behalf. The complainant eventually realised that he had allegedly fallen prey to a fraud racket and approached police.In the FIR, the complainant also mentioned the WhatsApp message threatening him to repay the money before Diwali.

Property case involving Sachdeva’s estranged wife

Sources said Sachdeva had also allegedly duped his estranged wife over a property worth around Rs 4.5 crore in Greater Noida.

A third case involved a domestic violence complaint filed by the wife.Police are now examining whether Manchanda had learnt about any of these alleged activities.The inquiry also revealed that Vats and Sachdeva had called Manchanda on the pretext of a client meeting on the day of the murder.A family friend of Manchanda said, “Yuvraj had informed his fiance that he was meeting the clients with Vats in 20 minutes and would call back soon.”

Phones being examined for body disposal searches

Investigators have seized an illegal pistol and the victim’s car, and both are being examined by forensic teams.Electronic equipment, including the accused’s phones, has been sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory to determine whether the couple had searched online for ways to dispose of a body.Cops have also found that the accused stopped in Vrindavan, Uttar Pradesh, while fleeing to Uttarakhand after the murder.

They suspect this might have been part of an attempt to dodge police.

‘Continuously changing statements’ on money dispute

“They have been continuously changing their statements about the alleged monetary dispute with Manchanda,” sources said.“Vats claimed that the victim had threatened her, but no evidence has been found so far,” an officer said.

Family raises issue over ZIPNET entry

Manchanda’s family has claimed that even on Sept 16, Gurgaon Police uploaded his entry in the “Unidentified persons found” portal on ZIPNET instead of “Unidentified dead bodies”.

The body was found in Gurgaon on Sept 10.Gurgaon Police, however, said there was no delay on its part and Delhi Police should have lodged a missing FIR within 24 hours of receiving the information from the family.They should also have flagged it to Gurgaon Police timely, knowing that Manchanda worked in Gurgaon, said a senior officer.

View the original on Times of India

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.