InquirerFrom Donki to Nike: Analyst says VP had ‘unusual’ purchases in 2025ESPNTakeaways and analysis from Valkyries' sweepESPN DeportesTigres vence al líder Toluca con doblete de Juan BrunettaThe Jerusalem PostPatel says FBI has arrested another person tied to ShinyHunters hackersPunchA’Court rejects El-Rufai’s bail applicationZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFCNN Türkİstanbul'da Ataşehir ve Eyüpsultan’da seçim günü!매일경제“명색이 집권당인데”…민주당 비공개 일정 요구에 추미애 ‘발끈’New Straits Times2027 Budget: Security measures must deliver stronger enforcement, says criminologistThe Sydney Morning HeraldV’landys throws weight behind Bears coach Meninga after CEO’s sudden exitSouth China Morning PostSouth Korea: 38 injured as ceiling collapses during Daegu sales eventThe Indian ExpressFor protesters and police at Jantar Mantar, lessons from Nana Patekar films
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 10, 2026

'Sexually suggestive remarks during vivas': What 11 JNU students alleged against prof

Translate

What 11 JNU students alleged against professor Bimol Akoijam: Sexually suggestive remarks during vivas, inappropriate advances at on-campus residence

Jawaharlal Nehru University has swiftly acted against professor Angomcha Bimol Akoijam following grave allegations of sexual harassment

NEW DELHI: Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has dismissed professor Angomcha Bimol Akoijam of Centre for the Study of Social Systems with immediate effect following an inquiry into allegations of sexual harassment levelled against the teacher by 11 students.

Akoijam is also the Congress MP from Inner Manipur constituency in Manipur.An order issued by the university Friday and signed by vice-chancellor Santishree D Pandit said the decision was taken after following the due process and considering the findings of Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), which had recommended a major penalty against the professor under Central Civil Services (classification, control and appeal) Rules, 1965.

Action ordered

Action ordered

JNU harassment case: Disagreement within panel over nature of penaltyThe committee submitted its report to the vice-chancellor Friday afternoon. Official sources said there had been a disagreement within the committee over the nature of the penalty to be recommended. While the presiding officer and other members favoured a major penalty, student representatives declined to sign on the recommendation, favouring a lesser punishment.

The report was consequently submitted with dissent after consultations with lawyers, sources said.Under provision 11 of the 1965 rules, penalties are divided into minor and major categories. Minor penalties include censure, withholding of promotion, recovery from pay of financial loss caused to govt through negligence or breach of orders, reduction in the pay scale by one stage for not more than three years, and withholding of increments.Major penalties include reduction to a lower stage in the pay scale for a specified period, reduction to a lower time-scale of grade, post or service, compulsory retirement, removal from service, and dismissal from service. While removal from service does not ordinarily disqualify a person from future govt employment, dismissal usually does.TOI, on Sept 6, first reported about the sexual harassment complaint submitted to ICC.

The complaints against the teacher were submitted on May 18 and the investigation was to conclude in 90 days as per the rules. However, due to summer vacation from May 27 to July 3, the inquiry got delayed.The matter reportedly came to light after a student shared her account of an alleged interaction during a viva examination in a students-only WhatsApp group, following which other students came forward with similar allegations. The students allegedly complained about sexually suggestive remarks during vivas and classes, inappropriate advances at gatherings at the professor’s on-campus residence, and offers of higher marks in exchange for sexual favours.The professor didn’t respond to TOI’s queries about the university’s decision. There was also no immediate response from Congress.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.