Inquirer EntertainmentFyang Smith humbled by ‘horror princess’ tag: ‘Malaking responsibility’InquirerDuterte impeachment: Witness shows Carpio buying shoes for youth teamBollywood HungamaHarshvardhan Rane buys luxury home worth Rs 15-16 crores in Mumbai: ReportSky TG24Allarmi bomba, Palazzo Chigi: "No a evacuazioni senza elementi concreti di pericolo"Daily MaverickQUALIFYING PUSH: Bafana Bafana ready to tackle troubled Kenyans in key Afcon qualification clashThe Jerusalem PostZelensky says Starshield speed is being limited again, hampering Ukraine's defensesZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioSoompiYounghoon Helps Luda Win Kim Dong Jun’s Heart Across Time In “Wi-Fi Love In The Palace”Antara NewsIndonesia seeks faster capital market reforms to protect investorsBBC NewsMedia industry could be forced to improve safeguards after Walliams allegationsESPN CricinfoICC plans to exercise greater control over T20 franchise leaguesWirtualna PolskaJajo moa sprzedane za 10,5 tys. dolarów. Wróci do Nowej Zelandii
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 12, 2026

Andy Burnham is beginning to sound like Keir Starmer with a northern accent

Translate

There was something spooky about listening to Andy Burnham deliver his speech at COP31 in Turkiye.

Close your eyes and it could have been his predecessor Sir Keir Starmer – just speaking with a northern accent.

The well-worn lines of “climate is a national security issue”, “Britain will answer the call” and even, oddly, using that old favourite of the Starmer era – “Britain is back” – it all sounded like he has the same script writer as his predecessor.

The “Britain is back” line was particularly jarring given that we have just had two years of a Labour government – admittedly with a different prime minister – saying exactly the same thing. Was it that nobody had noticed, or they just had failed to move the dial?

Even when Sir Keir said that line, the Tories had some justification in saying Britain had never gone away, considering the country’s international leadership on the war in Ukraine under both Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak.

Saying “Britain is back” is a way of trying to suggest you are doing more without actually doing much.

And there is some chuntering already in the corridors of Westminster that Mr Burnham is proving to be just the same as his predecessor in terms of policies – just with a greater flair in presenting them.

This is partly because Mr Burnham has limited himself by accepting the 2024 manifesto commitments, on tax in particular. But it’s also because his divergence from Sir Keir has largely been on incremental retail policies which do not cost a lot.

The reality of this speech was that these were global warming words with some performative announcements which masked the reality of what is going on at home in the UK.

Sir Keir Starmer (PA)

Sir Keir Starmer (PA) (PA Wire)

While Mr Burnham talks up the climate emergency at COP31, he is allowing drilling for oil and gas in the North Sea and rolling back electric vehicle targets.

He has just appointed Dame Madeleine Alessandri as the first UK special representative for climate security but there will be a serious question mark over whether she will be just another talking head with little power to change anything.

All of this reeks of the same timidity which bedevilled the Keir Starmer period in office. The same could have been said about the Budget last month where the big decisions were kicked down the road for another day.

None of this reflects a prime minister who came into office before the summer promising radical change and saying that Britain “took a wrong turn” 40 years ago, suggesting that the whole edifice of neoliberalism needs to be pulled down and replaced.

What we are getting with Burnham instead is watered down incrementalism, a little like his predecessor.

It may be that we have to wait for the 10-year plan to be published before Christmas to get a sense of what he really plans to do.

But, more likely, it feels like this Labour government plans to keep treading water until the next election at the earliest – and that could still be three years away.

View the original on The Independent →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.