The Jerusalem PostNumber of Iranian military personnel reported killed by US strikes this week rises to 13ESPN23 people with the most to gain (or lose) this NFL season: Barnwell on Mayfield, Pickens, Mannion, morePunchPolice probe officer who resigned over two-year salary access issueRTP DesportoEnric Mas consolida liderança após a 12.ª etapaESPN DeportesMadrid, el ganador del mercado de fichajes; Liverpool, el perdedorוואלהבג"ץ לאנשי השב"כ לשעבר שעתרו נגד זיני: חשפו את זהותכם בפניוInquirer EntertainmentAmerican jazz singer Cassandra Wilson dies at 70CBS NewsIran's attacks didn't impact military facilities used by U.S., official saysIl Fatto QuotidianoAddio a Enzo Bianchi, silenzio e commozione a Castel Boglione per i funerali: “Hai vissuto la forma più alta della paternità spirituale”Screen Rant10 Near-Perfect Disney Channel Original Movies That Nobody Remembers TodayPremium TimesAdewale Ayuba to release new five-track album, ‘Arise’The South AfricanWeather: Strong winds and severe thunderstorms set to hit these provinces
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, September 3, 2026

Federal judge blocks Trump’s latest order limiting birthright citizenship

Translate

A federal judge reinforced the constitutional right to birthright citizenship Wednesday, blocking President Donald Trump’s latest executive order to limit it.

U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman wrote in a 35-page ruling that Trump’s August order seeking to limit which people born in the U.S. can become American citizens “is almost certainly unconstitutional.”

Boardman cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s June ruling that Trump could not go forward with a separate 2025 executive order that sought to limit citizenship at birth.

“This Court must, once again, preliminarily enjoin enforcement of the President’s most recent attempt to strip the right to citizenship from them,” Boardman wrote.

Last week, Boardman had denied a request from the plaintiff in the case, CASA Inc., a nonprofit organization in Maryland, to block Trump’s executive order, though she noted that her denial was only due to a technicality: The original complaint cited Trump’s 2025 order, rather than the recent August order.

“This is different,” Boardman said Friday, comparing the August order to the first order. “This is unprecedented.”

Boardman also indicated that she would rule in favor of CASA Inc. after the complaint was updated, saying that she believed Trump is “trying to rewrite the carve-outs to birthright citizenship with the stroke of a pen.”

In Wednesday’s ruling, the judge reiterated that sentiment, writing: “Since his second term in office began on January 20, 2025, the President has tried, through Executive Order, to upend our country’s longstanding tradition of birthright citizenship and eliminate, for large swaths of Americans, the right to citizenship by birth, a right enshrined in the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.

Trump signed an executive order Aug. 6 to limit who could become U.S. citizens after being born in the country. The order was more narrow than the one the president signed on his first day of his second term, which sought to widely end birthright citizenship.

That 2025 order faced immediate legal action, as opponents wrote that it went against the 14th Amendment, which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”

After the Supreme Court blocked that order, Trump signed the August order that focused on restricting giving birthright citizenship to certain groups of people, including those who are born to parents who are considered an “alien enemy” of the United States or who work for foreign embassies.

The Wednesday ruling comes as the U.S. State Department has proposed requiring parents to provide proof of their own citizenship or immigration status when applying for passports for their children.

View the original on NBC News

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.