PunchTRCN uncovers 250 fake certificates in teachers’ recruitmentThe Jerusalem PostEditor’s Notes: At the GA, American Jews worry about the future of the Democratic PartyDaily MaverickLETTER TO MAHLAMBA NDLOPFU: Can we please now have a break from all this breaking news?한겨레[Column] China’s moment in the western Pacific is nighZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFSözcüMarmara'da lodos engeli: Şehir Hatları, İDO ve BUDO'da seferleri iptal edildiMyJoyOnlineEcobank JoyBusiness SME Fair 2026 opens today at Ghud Park, Accra MallSRF NewsSteuer-Dilemma – Heiratsstrafe erneut abschaffen – führt das zum Steuerchaos?Daily MailHow did Walliams cling on to his showbiz chums? String of celebrities who appeared on podcast months before allegations emerged of his predatory behaviour go quietSportstarNew Zealand vs India, 4th ODI LIVE updates: NZ 292/6 (44); Santner key as NZ approaches 300NumeramaUne panne géante frappe Microsoft : Outlook et Microsoft 365 impactés, voici ce que l’on saitABC News (Australia)Emergency services called to fatal workplace incident in Adelaide
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, November 13, 2026

US judge rejects FIFA bid to intervene in UEFA probe

Translate
Representative Image: FIFA has argued that UEFA was seeking discovery for “purportedly ​contemplated (but non-existent) Swiss criminal proceedings,” and was seeking to derail ⁠the FFE proposal from the outset.

Representative Image: FIFA has argued that UEFA was seeking discovery for “purportedly ​contemplated (but non-existent) Swiss criminal proceedings,” and was seeking to derail ⁠the FFE proposal from the outset. | Photo Credit: Reuters

infoIcon

Representative Image: FIFA has argued that UEFA was seeking discovery for “purportedly ​contemplated (but non-existent) Swiss criminal proceedings,” and was seeking to derail ⁠the FFE proposal from the outset. | Photo Credit: Reuters

A US judge on Thursday denied an attempt by ​FIFA’s American subsidiaries to intervene in UEFA’s ‌effort to obtain evidence for ​a potential Swiss criminal case ⁠against FIFA President Gianni Infantino over his abandoned World Cup commercial-rights plan.

“US FIFA ‌parties have no direct, substantial and legally protectable interest in ‌the subject matter of this ‌application,” ⁠US District Judge Jeannette Vargas ⁠said in her ruling.

“In light of this determination, the Court exercises its discretion to decline ​leave to ‌intervene.”

European football’s governing body had asked for permission to obtain testimony and documents from FIFA entities in Florida ‌for use in a planned ​criminal complaint in Switzerland against Infantino and other FIFA officials ⁠over a since-abandoned $20 billion World Cup sell-off plan known as FIFA Forward ‌Enterprise (FFE).

In a motion to intervene filed in September, FIFA asked the court to defer ruling on UEFA’s application or allow it to oppose the request.

The world governing body ‌argued that UEFA was seeking discovery for “purportedly ​contemplated (but non-existent) Swiss criminal proceedings,” and was seeking to derail ⁠the FFE proposal from the outset.

That proposal ⁠was withdrawn on July 31 after UEFA and other regional ‌governing bodies objected.

View the original on Sportstar →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.