PunchEKSU appoints new registrarוואלהמשמר החופים הסיני: מזהירים את הפיליפינים להפסיק לאלתר את "הפעולות הפרובוקטיביות"The Jerusalem PostNAZA, the money trail, and what the film leaves out about October 7 - opinionESPNTransfer rumors, news: Real Madrid, Barcelona track Man City-bound USMNT star SullivanInquirerRidon says trial remarks meant to explain, not influence impeach courtDaily MaverickFRENCH LETTER: All I Know… Thoughts on travel, book tours and school visitsInquirer EntertainmentNawat Itsaragrisil’s Miss Universe license agreement in jeopardyCNN TürkİTALYA'DA TÜRK TIR'INA BASKIN! Silahlı saldırganlar şoförü darbettiThe Straits Times7 weeks’ jail for ex-executive director of madrasah who misappropriated over $68k of its moneyCNN بالعربيةمعايير ثلاثة تحدد الفائز بالكرة الذهبية.. فكيف تبدو حظوظ ميسي ومبابي ويامال والبقية؟سكاي نيوز عربيةالعربية في العصر الرقمي.. قيمة اقتصادية تعزز الهوية والإبداعWirtualna PolskaRepublika w służbie Krala; Urban ogłosił powołania do kadry [SKRÓT PORANKA]
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, September 18, 2026

JKUAT Disputes Didmus Barasa’s Engineering Degree, Says Certificate Is Not Genuine

Translate

Kimilili Member of Parliament Didmus Barasa has come under fresh scrutiny after Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT) disputed the authenticity of an engineering degree certificate associated with him.

In a letter dated September 14, 2026, JKUAT Registrar of Academic Affairs Dr Aggrey Wanyama told the Consumers Federation of Kenya (COFEK) that Barasa was not a student at the university and that his name does not appear in its alumni records.

The university also stated that it did not hold a graduation ceremony in May 2008, the period indicated on the disputed Bachelor of Electrical and Electronic Engineering certificate.

Based on its verification, JKUAT concluded that the certificate was “NOT GENUINE.”

JKUAT says Barasa is not in its records

According to the university, its verification exercise found no academic records showing that Barasa studied at the institution.

The registrar said JKUAT had checked its records and established that the MP was not a student at the university.

The finding is significant because the disputed document purports to show that Barasa graduated from JKUAT with a Bachelor of Electrical and Electronic Engineering degree.

JKUAT, however, says there is no corresponding student or graduation record to support the qualification.

The university also noted that the date indicated on the certificate does not correspond with its graduation calendar, saying no graduation ceremony was held in May 2008.

EACC and EBK had reportedly received information

JKUAT further indicated that the matter had previously been brought to the attention of other institutions.

According to the university, the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and the Engineers Board of Kenya (EBK) had earlier investigated or received information concerning the qualification.

JKUAT said the same information regarding the legitimacy of the certificate had been communicated to the two institutions.

The latest response has therefore raised fresh questions about the outcome of those earlier inquiries and whether any action was taken following the information provided by the university.

COFEK seeks clarification

The latest development follows efforts by COFEK to establish the authenticity of Barasa’s academic credentials.

JKUAT’s letter provides a formal position from the institution named on the disputed certificate, stating that Barasa does not appear in its student or alumni records and that the university did not hold the graduation ceremony indicated on the document.

The university consequently maintains that the certificate is not genuine.

Questions now turn to EACC and EBK

JKUAT’s position is likely to put renewed focus on the agencies that previously received information concerning Barasa’s academic qualification.

The university has now formally stated that Barasa’s name does not appear in its alumni records, that there was no May 2008 graduation ceremony and that the disputed certificate is “NOT GENUINE.”

Attention will now turn to what EACC and EBK established during their earlier inquiries and whether their investigations resulted in any findings or action.

View the original on Ghafla

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.