ESPN DeportesGiants liberan al receptor Odell Beckham JrDaily MaverickWILD OMISSION: South Africa’s lion bone trade — the consequences the government never consideredESPNOur 30-team guide to NBA training camps: Biggest storylines, dates to monitorThe Jerusalem PostUK has 'strong indications' Iran was involved in RAF airbase bombing plot, Burnham saysRTP DesportoO que esperar da seleção portuguesa frente à Dinamarca?Rolling StoneHow to Watch ‘The Amazing Race’ Season 39 Online FreeDeadline‘His & Hers’ Team Developing Alice Feeney’s Next Book ‘Twist’ As Series With Fifth SeasonPremium TimesTanzania removes Nigeria from referral visa categoryCollider8 Worst Book-to-Movie Adaptations Ever, RankedZDF heuteTürkei: Unabhängige Nachrichtenseite "T24" gesperrtThe Hollywood ReporterClear for Take Off: Paramount’s $111 Billion Warner Bros. Buy Greenlit By Judge7sur7“Il devrait démissionner immédiatement”: Trump relance ses attaques contre l’ex-patron de la Fed
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 30, 2026

"An AI did it" is no defense, says nonprofit suing OpenAI over Hugging Face hack

Translate

After the Hugging Face hack, LASST staffers set aside their normal workloads “to design, coordinate, and participate in a briefing regarding this incident for regulators,” and have since responded to more briefing requests that required additional work. LASST staff put dozens of work hours into responding to OpenAI’s unsafe development practices, the lawsuit said.

“Despite the impact on LASST’s other programs, LASST nevertheless devoted its resources towards attempting to counteract OpenAI’s illegal conduct… If LASST prevails in this litigation, it will no longer need to divert its resources to combat the unlawful and unfair business practices employed by OpenAI concerning its AI agents hacking third parties during internal evaluations,” the lawsuit said.

Injunction request

The lawsuit said the requested injunction should forbid OpenAI “from knowingly accessing or causing to be accessed, themselves or through artificial intelligence agents that they develop, deploy, modify, or use, any computers, computer networks, or computer systems without authorization,” and “from knowingly employing an unfair business practice that threatens serious harm on the public.”

US lawmakers from both major parties have demanded answers from OpenAI, and a proposed “AI Kill Switch Act” would let US government officials order the shutdown of dangerous AI systems.

LASST said new regulations are needed to protect the public from AI risks but said California’s existing law makes it possible to rein in AI companies “without waiting for new regulation to catch up to the harms happening to businesses and consumers now.”

“We are filing this suit because OpenAI violated the law—and it needs to be held accountable,” the group said. “OpenAI and frontier AI developers more broadly can’t avoid the consequences of their unsafe actions just by claiming that ‘an AI did it.’ Autonomous AI agents will continue to hack, steal data, disrupt systems, and violate rights until a court steps in.”

View the original on Ars Technica →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.