Punch44 injured in France train derailmentThe Jerusalem PostSyrian national indicted for aiding 2025 Berlin Holocaust Memorial stabbingESPN DeportesAtlante no encontró respuesta y Pachuca escapó con la goleadaESPNMLB-best Brewers clinch playoff berth after 20-0 routInquirerMatibag: Cayetano siblings back in PH Sept. 12-13한겨레알래스카 앞바다 뒤집힌 배에서 홀로 표류…15살 소년 사흘 만에 구조돼CNN TürkPutin'den Avrupa'ya Ukrayna uyarısı: Bu bizimle savaş anlamına gelecekSözcüFındık bahçesini söktü, servet kazandı: Kilosu 250 liradan kapış kapış satılıyorSky TG24Dov'era Trump l'11 settembre 2001? Le storie raccontate dal presidente e cosa non tornaHet Laatste NieuwsDepraetere haalt 179 miljoen euro uit elektriciteitsfactuur: “Dit systeem maken we eerlijker”Lenta.ruПутин озвучил цены российских энергоносителей для продажиSouth China Morning PostHong Kong to table cooling-off period bill for beauty, fitness deals by mid-2027
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, September 12, 2026

OpenAI agents attacked RubyGems before Hugging Face incident, researchers say

Translate

AI agents’ growing ability to access and interact with external systems has raised concerns over the risks posed by increasingly capable AI models. (Express: Image/Reuters)

AI agents being tested by OpenAI attacked the software service RubyGems two months before they hacked the open-source platform Hugging Face, researchers said, the latest revelation of cyberattacks linked to major AI developers that have spooked the public and spurred calls for tighter regulation.

Many incidents where AI agents from developers such as OpenAI and rival Anthropic have hacked or attempted ⁠to ​access external systems have heightened concerns over the increasing capacity of AI models and developers’ ability to contain them.

The latest revelation also comes as growing numbers of U.S. lawmakers call for new rules to govern AI systems after dire warnings from two Anthropic researchers that rapidly progressing AI could lead to the extinction of the human race in the not-too-distant future.

AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious ​packages ​to RubyGems on May 11, according to a group of researchers who posted ⁠their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents.”

OpenAI confirmed the incident.

“Based on our review, our agents used the RubyGems platform to access the internet to ‌carry out benign tasks and retrieve public information. We’ll continue to investigate as part of our broader review of agent activity during training and evaluation,” an OpenAI spokesperson said in a statement.

The agents, which are generally tasked with assignments such as creating reports or filling out spreadsheets, appear to have used RubyGems to access publicly available data as part of a training run, OpenAI said, adding that they are in touch with RubyGems to review the incident.

Latest revelation of attacks by AI agents

IPO-bound rival Anthropic has also reported a string of attacks by its agents. On ⁠Wednesday, it disclosed a fourth instance of ⁠an AI model hacking external systems during testing.

Story continues below this ad

For OpenAI, which is also gearing up for an IPO, the RubyGems attack would mark at least the third ⁠major instance where its agents attacked another ‌company’s infrastructure.

A swarm of OpenAI agents previously hijacked a German-language wiki site and turned it ​into an improvised messaging platform for cheating on tests, an incident that OpenAI kept ‌secret as it dealt with the fallout from the July hack of the open-source repository Hugging Face.

The AI agents in May tried to steal RubyGems user credentials by exploiting a previously unknown vulnerability in the ‌site’s servers, though it is ​unclear whether the ​attempt succeeded, the researchers ​said on Friday.

The agents also exploited RubyDoc.info, a site that generates code documentation, to run their own code on its servers, they said.

Story continues below this ad

AI researchers Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen and Sydney ​Von Arx said it was not clear why the AI agents chose this ⁠strategy or whether it was successful, as they do not have access to the rest of the AI behaviour.

In a blog post on Friday, RubyGems said its own investigation found no evidence the attempts succeeded. It said the company could not determine if ‌the packages in ⁠the “spam-publishing campaign” were created or published by AI agents.

A member of RubyGems’ security team in May described the incident — which forced the company to temporarily pause new account registrations — as a “major malicious ​attack.”

The Wall Street Journal first reported the RubyGems incident on Friday.

View the original on The Indian Express

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.