CNN TürkFındıkta ağustos ayı işlem hacmi belli olduRTP DesportoCampeã Madalena Costa lidera ambição lusa às medalhas no Mundial de patinagemPunchPhone-shy Brazilian president embraces selfies in push for re-electionInquirerThunderstorm advisory up in Metro Manila, other Luzon areas ThursdayThe Jerusalem PostAmerican, Russian officials meet on bringing US investor into Nord Stream gas pipeline to GermanyESPNTransfer rumors, news: Man United, Chelsea in race for Spurs academy starZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFUOLSão Paulo deve ter chuva isolada à tarde e máxima de 29°C nesta quinta (8)RapplerLIVE UPDATES: Impeachment trial of Vice President Sara DuterteBusiness AMDuitsland bouwt nieuwe marinebasis in Emden om NAVO-macht te versterken7sur7Après le fiasco de l’exécution ratée de Christa Pike, les États-Unis reprennent les mises à mortالنهارساهم في الحد من الاحترار المناخي... بـ 6 قرارات فقط
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 8, 2026

DR Congo Ineligible Player: NFF sent petition to wrong email – FIFA

Translate

One of the technical grounds on which FIFA dismissed Nigeria’s protest against DR Congo for fielding an ineligible player in the world cup qualifiers was that the mail which they used in sending the petition wasn’t the right one.

DR Congo pipped Nigeria to book a place in the intercontinental playoff with a 4-3 win on penalties after both teams stayed locked at 1-1 after extra time.

According to the New York Times, FIFA discovered that Nigeria’s petition against Lionel Mpasi who was in goal in the playoff final didn’t fulfill the requirements of his nationality

switch from France to Congo, before taking part in the game.

However they dismissed the appeal by Nigeria on what they term as technical grounds following the late filing of the case by Nigeria. A bogus claim which has now put them under intense

scrutiny from the world at large.

According to a highly placed source at the National Sports Commission (NSC), FIFA cited the fact that the petition was sent to the General Secretary (GS) rather than the legal portal as part of the technical ground on which it was dismissed.

A laughable claim because all petitions and correspondence are first and foremost routed to the GS, who most times reply nations and give directions on where complaints should be forwarded to.

Another ground was that it was filed late. A lame excuse because doing the right thing after an infraction of such magnitude shouldn’t be time barred.

View the original on Vanguard →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.