CNN TürkBalıkesir'de tekne kazasında hayatını kaybeden doktor için tören düzenlendiESPN DeportesLos Sixers intentan la remontada frente a los PistonsESPNFollow live: Jaxon Smith-Njigba hauls in TD as Seahawks build leadThe Jerusalem PostBrazil's Lula reelected to a historic fourth term in runoff votePunchNigeria’s debts and future development한겨레박찬대 인천시장 “임기 중 경제성장률 5% 달성 목표”UOLLíderes estrangeiros parabenizam Lula por reeleiçãoZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio경향신문귀에 거는 삼성 첫 클립형 무선 이어폰 ‘버즈 온’ 출시매일경제30주년 앞두고 스테이크 힘준다…빕스, 청량리 롯데몰에 ‘그릴 다이닝’New Straits TimesMalaysia faces RM176bil power investment bill to fuel data centre boomDaily MailShocking moment demonstrators waving Palestinian flags forced their way into Rome's Colosseum - as protests spread across Europe
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 26, 2026

‘Creamy layer case in SC won’t hit seniority of CSE-2025 batch’: Sources

Translate

‘Creamy layer case in SC won’t hit seniority of CSE-2025 batch’

File photo: Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The pendency of the case regarding the OBC creamy layer in Supreme Court will not affect the seniority of successful candidates of 2025 batch even though their service allocation and foundation course are still to be finalised, official sources said on Sunday.DoPT officials said, “The department and all training institutes are prepared to allocate services expeditiously to CSE- 2025 candidates and commence foundation course at the earliest. Delay in commencement of the foundation course will have no bearing on the seniority, gradation or other service conditions of the candidates.”The clarification concerns the fate of successful candidates in the wake of SC’s Rohith Nathan judgement of March 11 in which it had said “salary” cannot be added to “income” for defining “creamy layer” criteria for any category of OBC candidates, including those whose parents are employed in PSUs/banks, etc. The judgement pertained to the case of candidates from PSU background being categorised over the years as “creamy layer” by including “salary” in the “income” of their parents.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.