Judge tosses drug trafficking convictions for B.C. compassion club founders after constitutional challenge
A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has ruled in favour of two harm-reduction activists convicted of drug trafficking who argued they were doing it to reduce the harms caused by toxic drugs.
Judge says DULF founders 'selflessly' put their lives on hold during public health emergency
The Canadian Press
·
Listen to this article
Estimated 2 minutes
The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.
A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has ruled in favour of two harm-reduction activists convicted of drug trafficking who argued they were doing it to reduce the harms caused by toxic drugs.
Justice Catherine Murray found parts of Canada's Controlled Drugs and Substances Act unconstitutional and stayed the convictions against Jeremy Kalicum and Eris Nyx.
Murray said Kalicum and Nyx's compassion club, the Drug User Liberation Front (DULF), reduced the harms associated with the toxic drug crisis and did not negatively impact the community or public safety.
Kalicum and Nyx were found guilty last year of drug trafficking after Vancouver police raided the club in 2023.
Drug User Liberation Front founders found guilty of drug trafficking
More stories from Vancouver-South Coast
Murray said in court on Tuesday that the pair "selflessly" put themselves to the side for the cause.
"Mr. Kalicum and Ms. Nyx have borne the burden of bringing a successful constitutional challenge, thereby doing the public interest a service at considerable personal cost," Murray said.
WATCH | Thousands have died of toxic drugs. Did politics get in the way of saving lives?:
She noted thousands of people have died due to toxic drugs since the public health emergency was declared in B.C. in 2016.
Murray put Kalicum and Nyx's convictions on hold last year to hear the constitutional challenge, where their lawyers argued that forcing drug users to rely on unregulated street drugs violates the Charter of Rights.
Murray said in her ruling then that Nyx and Kalicum's intentions were good as they tried to save lives, but that buying pure drugs on the dark web and selling them to members was not covered by an exemption that allowed for drug storage and testing.
She said the two were "agitators" who wanted to make change and were aware that they ran the risk of a trafficking prosecution.
Kalicum and Nyx's lawyers had argued that closing the club violated the rights of those who are disabled by addiction and raised their risk of death from an unregulated, illicit drug supply.
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.