PunchUK increases student visa financial requirements for international studentsThe Jerusalem PostQatari mediators present peace deal to Iran in mediation effort, official saysInquirer EntertainmentDonny Pangilinan felt ‘awkward’ over Showtime Baby Doll Juby’s dream about himDaily MaverickWildlife is not livestock — Aucamp’s dangerous plan to turn conservation into agricultureInquirerMimaropa drug bust in Palawan yields ₱51,884 worth of ‘shabu’ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFRTL BoulevardDebbie uit B&B Vol Liefde zet na 22 jaar haar Spaanse droom te koopFootball ItaliaSerie A: Monza vs. Napoli – Probable line-ups and where to watch on TVAntara NewsMinistry targets data centers, energy storage as downstreaming marketsSCMP ChinaChina’s former vice-premier Liu Yandong dies in Beijing20 MinutenSo viel Zucker steckt in deiner TiefkühlpizzaObservador DesportoHabitação. "Mais de metade do mercado em Portugal é infor...
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 28, 2026

'Won't make questions disappear': Dipke accuses Centre of Instagram crackdown

Translate

'Taking down Instagram accounts won't make questions disappear': Abhijeet Dipke accuses Centre of digital crackdown

CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke

NEW DELHI : Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke on Wednesday criticised the Centre over an alleged crackdown on anti-government posts and accounts on Instagram.

He warned that silencing citizens by taking down content would not address the public grievances.On Wednsday, in a post on X, Dipke wrote, “The Instagram crackdown is not going to work!“The government is taking down thousands of posts and accounts every day, but it seems to be missing a fundamental point.“Instagram is just a platform where people are raising their questions. The reasons behind those questions exist far beyond social media, and taking down accounts won't make them disappear,” Dipke wrote, warning that the alleged censorship could further erode trust among the very people the government is supposed to answer to.His remarks come amid wider scrutiny of online content restrictions and freedom of expression. Activists and political groups have raised concerns over account suspensions and takedown directives, including those reportedly issued under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act.According to PTI, social media platforms including Meta and X have been asked by the Centre to restrict posts and handles raising questions on youth unemployment, governance, and public infrastructure.

Critics argue that restricting online content does not address underlying concerns over unemployment, examination paper leaks, governance and public infrastructure.The issue has also reached the courts. On October 27, the Delhi High Court issued notice to the Centre and the concerned department on a petition challenging the withholding of the Instagram handle @bring_back__ballot in India.The account is associated with the “Bring Back Ballot” initiative of Mission Save Constitution and advocate Mehmood Pracha, its national convenor.The petition stated that the handle was withheld on October 10, the day organisers held a protest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. It displayed the message: “Account not available in India. This is because we complied with a legal request to restrict this content.”

The petitioners alleged, “No notice, hearing, reasons or copy of any order was ever furnished to the Petitioners.”The initiative advocated a return to paper ballots under the slogan “EVM Hatao Desh Bachao”.

The petition said organisers had informed Delhi Police about the protest on October 9.Justice Amit Mahajan issued notice and sought the Centre’s response. Central Government Standing Counsel Ashish Dixit accepted notice on behalf of the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and the designated officer. Advocate Amee Rana accepted notice for Meta Platforms.The matter is listed for hearing on November 6, when the court is expected to consider the petition further.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.