Woman at centre of Cornell gang-rape case was 'misled' about investigation, lawyer says
The woman who says several men raped her at a Cornell University fraternity party was "misled" about the status of the criminal investigation in the weeks after she went to police, her lawyer said Wednesday.
Criminal inquiry ended almost as soon as it began, but Jane Doe was given impression it was ongoing: lawyer
The Associated Press
·
Listen to this article
Estimated 6 minutes
The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.
The woman who says several men raped her at a Cornell University fraternity party was "misled" about the status of the criminal investigation in the weeks after she went to police, her lawyer said Wednesday.
Even as she took her allegations about a 2024 gang rape at the Chi Phi fraternity house through Cornell's internal disciplinary process, the university's police department gave her the impression that a criminal investigation was continuing, lawyer Thomas Giuffra told The Associated Press.
In fact, the criminal inquiry ended almost as soon as it began.
Tompkins County district attorney Matthew Van Houten, the local prosecutor, made the decision not to go forward with a criminal case within days of the woman giving her first substantial interviews to police.
Van Houten has said he asked Cornell's police department to convey the decision to the woman, who is referred to in court documents as Jane Doe, but never spoke personally to her or her lawyer.
Giuffra said the woman was told the criminal investigation was ongoing.
"I think she was misled," he said. "I was involved with this case early on. I thought they were still investigating. It was news to me that they weren't doing anything."
At the time, Giuffra added, he assumed investigators just needed more time to speak with witnesses and build a case.
"But nothing was being done, and we didn't know that," he said.
A messages seeking comment was left for Van Houten. Cornell's media relations office, citing pending litigation, declined to comment on behalf of the university's police department.
The district attorney said in a statement last week that he was confident no further investigation was necessary after prosecutors and criminal investigators from his office reviewed a six-page summary of the woman's account, written by a police officer.
WATCH | What we know about the case:
'Cornell 7' lawsuit: What we know
September 29|
Duration
2:53
Alumni are threatening to pull funding, celebrities are lashing out and people are boycotting institutions associated with Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., after an alleged gang rape ignited the internet. The case came into the spotlight after the victim, known in court documents as Jane Doe, filed a civil lawsuit on Sept. 16, alleging the private Ivy League university protected the seven men, now dubbed 'the Cornell 7.' She alleges they drugged and assaulted her over several hours at a frat house in October 2024. WARNING: This video may affect those who have experienced sexual violence or know someone affected by it. It also contains vulgar language.Different accounts
Based on that summary, Van Houten said he believed no crime had been committed, and that the woman's participation in drug use and sex was "voluntary, conscious and consensual."
That description differs sharply with what the woman told police and university investigators, and with what she alleged in a lawsuit filed against seven Chi Phi fraternity members, Cornell and others last month.
Among other things, Giuffra said, the six-page report omitted the woman telling investigators, "I can say with 100 per cent confidence I was raped," that she was subjected to physical violence, and that a fraternity brother had sent a message to a group chat using a vulgar term to advertise that a woman's body was freely available.
Last week, citing investigative records it obtained, the New York Times reported that a Cornell police investigator tried to get Van Houten's office to consider additional evidence in the weeks after the alleged rape, but was rebuffed.
"At first I thought these police were incompetent," Giuffra said. "It sounds like they were doing the right thing. And they just got shut down."
Giuffra said while he and Jane Doe have received death threats, he has been heartened by an outpouring of support — including rallies and protests on the Cornell campus and more than 1,000 women who have emailed him to share anger, frustration, solidarity and stories of their own assaults.
WATCH | Anger over Cornell's handling of the case:
Cornell students protest university handling of sexual assault case
October 5|
Duration
2:42
Students at Cornell are protesting their university’s handling of an alleged sexual assault case after an investigation revealed the accused faced a range of punishments from expulsion to writing papers.Case taken away from Van Houten
Jane Doe, who was a student in 2024, alleges that Chi Phi members plied her with alcohol and drugs and several of them sexually assaulted her. One man sent others a message inviting them to participate, according to a lawsuit she filed last month.
Lawyers for two of the men have denied they participated in a sexual assault. Attempts by The Associated Press to reach the others or their representatives have been unsuccessful. Some of the men who underwent a university disciplinary hearing in 2024 told investigators that the sexual activity was consensual or said they were not involved.
The woman went to Cornell police in November 2024, though no criminal charges resulted. In the wake of her lawsuit, Van Houten said he was reopening the investigation. Days later, Gov. Kathy Hochul took the case away from him and appointed the state's attorney general, Letitia James, as a special prosecutor.
Jane Doe at centre of Cornell rape case targeted with threats, her lawyer says
Cornell taps ex-Justice Department official Sally Yates to review school's handling of sexual assault cases
Giuffra applauded the move, saying he was troubled by Van Houten's plan for conducting the reopened investigation and "didn't think he was up to the task."
Giuffra said the district attorney wanted to take the case to a grand jury and have Jane Doe testify before the panel within two weeks.
That timeline, leaving little time to review evidence or interview witnesses, suggested Van Houten may have been trying "to go take a dive and not really give it his best effort and not do any investigation," Giuffra said.
James hasn't said how long her investigation might take, but suggested it could be months.
On Wednesday, one of the men named in Jane Doe's lawsuit filed a court petition seeking James's removal from the case, arguing she showed bias by posting on social media a few days before her appointment: "What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable."
A spokesperson for James declined to comment.
Cornell closed down the Chi Phi campus chapter in 2024 and says it expelled some students and suspended others after an investigation under the federal Title IX law.
This week Cornell trustees brought in former U.S. deputy attorney general Sally Yates to review how the school investigates sexual assault and sexual harassment, how the disciplinary process works, the campus police response and more.
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.