RTP DesportoCompanhia aérea Etihad pondera tomar medidas legais contra Liga inglesaPunchPremier League wants Man City ruling before season endsESPNJJ Gabriel and the 'nightmare' battle for Premier League academy talentInquirerWATCH: Sara Duterte impeachment trial | Oct. 1, 2026CNN TürkTrump’tan dizel ihracatına yasak sinyali: Benzin fiyatları artabilirThe Jerusalem PostRubio orders Iran UNGA delegation to leave United States following stalled negotiations - reportBollywood HungamaAlia Bhatt joins Rami Malek, Sachin Tendulkar and Simone Ashley for a star-studded Earthshot Prize 2026 night in MumbaiUOLFilme premiado no Festival de Veneza, 'Naza' detalha as mortes de civis em GazaSözcüSPK duyurdu: İsteğe bağlı iade hesapları açıldıVanguardPerfection Motor: Driving Nigeria’s Growth with Reliable FAW TrucksSouth China Morning PostUkraine scrambles as Russia’s jet drones breach Kyiv’s defencesIl Fatto Quotidiano“Puff Daddy in carcere fa la bella vita”: massaggi cinesi, cognac di contrabbando, foto osé sul cellulare e un esercito di detenuti pagati per cucinargli curry di pollo e pulirgli il bagno
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 1, 2026

Why did SC junk petitions vs adjusted impeachment voting threshold?

Translate

Why did SC junk petitions vs adjusted impeachment voting threshold?

In its decision, the SC cites lack of legal standing and prematurity as reasons for dismissing the legal challenges

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court (SC) dismissed the petitions against the adjusted voting threshold in Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial.

The Senate impeachment court’s September 23 decision stated that the court will count only the votes of senator-judges who are “legally and factually capable” of participating in the proceedings at the time of the vote. Originally, the two-thirds voting threshold was fixed at 16 out of 24 senators.

After this decision, at least three petitions were filed before the SC last month.

But in its decision, the High Court dismissed the petitions due to lack of legal standing and prematurity.

View the original on Rappler →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.