וואלהרעידת אדמה בעוצמה 5.87 הכתה באינדונזיהPunchNigeria targets local production of military hardware, anti-drone systemsESPNSeminoles star Whaley, 22, wins U.S. Amateur titleESPN DeportesTijuana vs. Cruz Azul: El reencuentro de Lira y Mora tras el MundialThe Jerusalem PostEisenkot's Yashar unveils plan to support new olim integrating into Israelالنهاررسالة من "حزب الله" إلى بريطانيا وأذربيجان: ممنوع إرسال جنودكم إلى لبنان!한겨레광복절 경축식 태극기에 “반국가세력 신종 암호”라는 국힘 대변인단InquirerClasses on despite sizzling heat in Cagayan de OroInquirer EntertainmentKendra Kramer defends parents from claims they ‘take advantage’ of kidsNew Straits TimesDuplantis masterclass for fourth Euro pole vault titleScreen Rant5 Naruto Quotes That Hit Harder As Adults경향신문패션아이템 된 가발도 한국이 선도···특허경쟁력 ‘2위’
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, August 17, 2026

Sandiganbayan junks graft case vs DILG Usec Mabilog

Translate
Undersecretary for Public Safety Jed Patrick Mabilog.
DILG Usec. Jed Patrick Mabilog —Grig C. Montegrande

MANILA, Philippines — The Sandiganbayan Third Division has junked the graft case against Interior Undersecretary Jed Patrick Mabilog due to “inordinate delay,” as it took government prosecutors more than seven years to file the case in the anti-graft court after it received a complaint against him.

This developed after Associate Justice Karl Miranda, Third Division chair, granted the motion to quash filed by Mabilog on Oct. 10, 2024, according to the resolution promulgated on Wednesday, Aug. 12.

According to the case information filed by the Office of the Ombudsman prosecutors, Mabilog, then Iloilo City mayor, was charged with graft over having an alleged direct financial or pecuniary interest in creating 3L Towering Services.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mabilog allegedly contributed P500,000 as initial capital for 3L Towering Services, which was eventually hired by the local government of Iloilo City to undertake clamping or towing of illegally parked vehicles within its jurisdiction purportedly without competitive process, according to prosecutors.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

In his motion to quash, Mabilog argued that the case information did not allege facts constituting an offense, and his constitutional right to speedy disposition was violated.

On the first point, the court ruled that “the information sufficiently alleges facts constituting the offense charged.”

As to his second argument, the ruling said: “As the Office of the Ombudsman has failed to discharge its burden of justifying the delay, the only appropriate and lawful remedy is the immediate and permanent dismissal of the present case against Mabilog.”

A complaint-affidavit against Mabilog was lodged before the Office of the Ombudsman on April 23, 2015, but the prosecutors only filed the case information in the Sandiganbayan on May 19, 2022.

The court noted that there was a total lapse of seven years, 10 months, and seven days from the filing of complaint up to the filing of the case in the anti-graft court. /cb

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.