2026's Most Visionary Masterpiece Is a 55-Year-Old Uncensored Re-Release | Review
Samuel is Collider's List Flex Editor (previously Lead List Editor), which means he's pretty much always hovering around Collider's List department. A writing and editing automaton based in Nashville, Tennessee, Samuel has been working in entertainment journalism for over 10 years.
Samuel is the guy who talked to Betty White about vodka and hot dogs. Chaz Ebert once pinched Samuel's cheeks after a screening of Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, when Samuel told her that Roger was and forever is his hero. William Friedkin once jokingly called Samuel "dad" at a screening of Samuel's favorite movie, The Babadook. Forbes once called Samuel a "sneering critic" because he disliked Don't Look Up.
Two major brands have trusted Samuel with curating their respective lists of the 100 Best Movies of All Time. Samuel wrote one of these lists in its entirety.
Other career highlights include appearing on KCRW and meeting Joe Morgenstern, and also spending 50 minutes talking to Tommy Wiseau on a landline (which was awesome).
Samuel loves his job and is rarely actively not doing it.
Sign in to your Collider account
I felt something between dismissiveness and contempt for Ken Russell's The Devils the first time I saw it 15 years ago, while in film school—viewed on a sub-VHS quality, censored bootleg because that was the best version available. At the time, I discounted it as empty exploitation, and failed to embrace the technical artistry and thematic depth. (This was also a time when I worshiped Roger Ebert's writing, and surely was influenced by his zero-star 1971 review.)
It shouldn't really be a shocker that a 20-year-old college student might change his mind about a film a decade and a half later. But the journey I've gone on with The Devils is unlike anything else in my life as a cinephile—a personal experience that is largely reflective of the overall change in public opinion regarding the English director's infamous, genre-bending, long-censored or outright banned magnum opus.
I warmed to The Devils after watching another low-quality, unofficially released cut of the film a few years ago—this time with a few minutes of previously censored footage rather clumsily edited back in (several scenes were considered lost before film critic Mark Kermode discovered them, reportedly mislabeled and nearing total decomposition, in a Warner Bros. vault in 2002). My change in opinion wasn't just due to the passage of time; the most controversial, long-censored moments of The Devils are, in fact, indispensable to its impact, and once they are added in, they completely alter the experience of watching it for the better.
I had a healthy level of anticipation walking into the 2026 proper re-release of the uncensored cut of The Devils — the first time an uncut version has ever been made officially available. After experiencing Warner Clockwork's stunning restoration, I can easily say I've never changed my mind so drastically about a movie in my entire life.
Spectacularly restored using elements from Russell's personal copy of the film as well as the original negative, The Devils feels timeless in its vision. A frenzied genre hybrid of 17th-century period drama, darkly hilarious satire, and shocking, sobering psychological horror, this is one of those rare movies that you can truly say is unlike anything else you've ever seen. The Devils is a subversive, shocking masterpiece with ferocious entertainment value and genuine spiritual depth. It's heartening to see that the film has been embraced in its 2026 theatrical run, extended beyond the original intended one-week window, while receiving universal critical acclaim that once eluded it.
What Is 'The Devils' About?
Russell's script is based on a 1952 Aldous Huxley non-fiction book and a 1960 John Whiting play of the same name, both of which were inspired by real people and events that occurred in western France circa 1634. In the performance of his career, Oliver Reed plays Father Urbain Grandier, an impossibly charismatic, sexually active, hypocritical and selfish Catholic priest who commands considerable influence and power within the walled French city of Loudun. Seeking to overthrow Grandier in order to demolish Loudun's walls, Cardinal Richelieu (Christopher Logue) and King Louis XIII (Graham Armitage) see an opening when the sexually repressed abbess Jeanne des Anges (an expertly chilling Vanessa Redgrave), obsessed and rejected by Grandier, accuses the priest of heresy and witchcraft. Front and center in The Devils, Reed and Redgrave deliver Oscar-caliber performances that surely would have garnered Academy attention if the film hadn't been so mired in controversy upon initial release.
The outcome of Grandier's ensuing trial is decided before it begins, and the setup of the first two acts leads to a gruesome series of rolling climaxes filled with torture, depravity and death. Grandier's faith is put to a final, unspeakable test as he's pressured to confess to crimes that no one actually believes he committed. Meanwhile, the nuns of Sister Jeanne's Ursuline convent are essentially political prisoners; if they fail to contribute to the hysteria, doing and saying exactly what the King and Cardinal expect of them—essentially, feigning demonic possession—they'll surely be tortured and killed, too. Just like Grandier, they are entirely at the mercy of corrupt, powerful, and perhaps even truly evil men.
Over a now-complete runtime of almost two hours, The Devils descends into pure madness and hysteria that's still outrageous and shocking in 2026; perhaps it's not all that hard to understand why international censors struggled so notoriously with it in 1971.
Collider Exclusive · 8 Questions · 2 Minutes What Is Your Biggest Horror Nightmare? Elm Street · Chucky · Scream · The Conjuring
Four horror franchises. Four completely different ways of scaring you. One waits until you fall asleep. One makes sure nobody believes you. One is already in your group of friends. And one is in the house with your family. Answer eight quick questions about how you actually watch horror, and find out which nightmare was built for you.
😴Elm Street(Freddy Krueger)
🧸Chucky(Child's Play)
📞Scream(Ghostface)
🕯️The Conjuring(The Warren Files)
01
Which horror scene makes you cover your eyes? Four classic images. One of them is worse than the others for you.
02
You are home alone and you hear a noise. First thought? Everybody has one. It arrives before you have decided anything.
03
Which horror movie rule would you break first? Everybody thinks they would survive. Almost nobody actually does.
04
Something genuinely frightening happens. What do you do? Not in a film. In your actual living room, tonight.
05
How do you actually watch a horror film? Be honest about this one. Nobody is checking.
06
Somebody offers you serious money. Which do you still refuse? The amount does not matter. There is one on this list you are not doing.
07
Which feeling stays with you a week after the film? Good horror does not stop when the credits do.
08
Something wakes you at 3am. What is the worst possibility? Eight questions in, this is the one that decides your nightmare.
The Lights Just Went Out Your Nightmare Is…
Four franchises, four completely different ways of getting underneath your skin. This is the one built out of your particular fear, why it works so well on you, and what it would leave behind.
Elm Street
Your nightmare does not wait outside the door. It waits for you to close your eyes, which you are going to have to do eventually, because nobody has ever won that particular argument.
- Freddy is horror's cruellest idea: a threat that lives in the one place you cannot guard, cannot lock, and cannot avoid forever.
- You are the one who is fine during the film and wide awake at two in the morning. Your own head is where this does its damage.
- These films understood exhaustion as a horror engine. The kids on Elm Street do not lose because they are weak. They lose because they are tired.
- You can lock every door in the house. You still have to sleep.
Chucky
Your nightmare is not really the doll. It is the face of the person you tell, and the way they decide, very kindly, that you have imagined all of it.
- Chucky works precisely because he is absurd. That is the trap: the more accurately you describe him, the less anybody is going to believe you.
- You are the one shouting at the screen because the characters are not listening. You know that feeling from real life too.
- The franchise is at its best when the adults in the room are the real obstacle, and you have met those adults.
- By the time somebody finally believes you, you will have handled most of it on your own.
Scream
Your nightmare has your number, knows your name, and has almost certainly been inside your house before. The worst part is that you already know them.
- Scream is the only one of these where the killer takes the mask off and turns out to be somebody who was at the party.
- You are the person who calls the twist out loud before it lands. You watch people the same way you watch films.
- The franchise made the rules of horror part of the plot, which means the survivors are the ones paying attention. You would be paying attention.
- Everybody is a suspect, including the person who just offered to walk you home.
The Conjuring
Your nightmare is not really about you. It is about the people asleep down the hall, and the feeling that whatever is here is not interested in leaving.
- The Conjuring films are domestic horror. The house, the family, the perfectly ordinary room that quietly stops feeling ordinary.
- Your instinct is to get everybody into one room. Your fear is protective rather than personal, which is rarer than it sounds.
- This is the one franchise where belief is the weapon. The people who come through it are the ones who are not alone and refuse to be.
- Whatever is here did not come for you. It came for the household, and you are the one standing in the hallway.
Ken Russell's Defining Work Is Finally Uncut and Uncensored, In an All-Time Great Restoration
If work like Robert A. Harris' on Lawrence of Arabia, and Harris and James C. Katz's on Vertigo remain the gold standard for restorations, then surely this achievement by Warner Clockwork (The Devils is the first theatrical release from the arthouse label founded in late 2025) deserves to be mentioned in the same breath. It's all the more remarkable given the The Devils'' beleaguered history. Executed in tandem with production designer Derek Jarman and cinematographer David Watkin, Russell's vision of The Devils is garishly exaggerated period detail, expressionistic but thoroughly cohesive. Whether experienced on digital, or even better, via one of many 35mm prints playing internationally, this new restoration reveals striking touches you simply couldn't fully appreciate from previous transfers, from the King's sleazily splashy metallic gold wardrobe to ashy bone matter visible in the wake of a climactic execution.
The restoration of the previously censored scenes do far more than satisfy the viewer's curiosity; they profoundly alter the film. The most infamous scene in The Devils—the one that was long considered lost media and made this picture something of a white whale of banned films—is a spectacularly unsettling orgy set atop a crucifix. Out of context, this seems like pure shock value. In the final cut here, though, as Russell intended, it's juxtaposed with Grandier partaking in sacrament and a newly married life, making strides toward becoming a better and more sincere man. This sequence is the heart and the point of the entire film; there's a kind of raw, maniacal power to it that's hard to describe. Removing it guts the entire experience and thesis. And restoring it is essential in making The Devils one of the most exciting things to happen to cinema in 2026.
'The Devils' Depicts a Lot of Blasphemy, but That Doesn't Make It Blasphemous
The most powerful movies I've ever seen about the Christian faith (and as a Christian myself, I suppose this means they are the most powerful movies to me, period) are intense and disturbing, movies about faith strengthening in the face of overwhelming adversity. And after seeing this thrilling new restoration of The Devils, I would directly compare it to two other punishing, widely acclaimed films that tackle the complexities of Christian faith against oppressive darkness and corruption: William Friedkin's supernatural horror classic The Exorcist, and Abel Ferrara's disturbing crime drama Bad Lieutenant. In my eyes, these movies form a kind of spiritual trilogy, each about critically flawed men struggling with Catholic faith, who are redeemed at the eleventh hour through the most horrific tests imaginable. All three of these pictures are graphic and remarkably disturbing watches, but the punishing content serves a purpose in all three cases. Faith tests the faithful; cinema provides a uniquely visceral and immediate means of conveying this.
The Devils stands apart from these other two movies in its disarmingly funny dark humor and focus on sheer period spectacle, but the thematic links are undeniable. Beneath the layers of horrid spectacle and biting satire—and, in fact, enhanced by all of that—this is actually one of the most earnestly affecting movies about Christianity you'll ever see.
This fact might surprise some who've chosen to condemn The Devils over the years, but Russell was a practicing Catholic since young adulthood, and he made this picture as a means of protesting those who bastardize faith, and matters of church and state, as a means of manipulation and abusing power. On one hand, it's disheartening that it's taken 55 years for audiences and critics to fully appreciate how perfectly he succeeded in his mission. At the same time, this restoration is an astounding achievement. It isn't really an overstatement to call it a miracle.
- Release Date
- July 16, 1971
- Runtime
- 114 Minutes
- Director
- Ken Russell
- Writers
- Ken Russell, Aldous Huxley
-
Sister Jeanne des Anges
-
Oliver Reed
Father Urbain Grandier
Pros & Cons
- Ken Russell's The Devils is a stunning, often horrifying and darkly funny genre hybrid with remarkable spiritual depth.
- Oliver Reed and Vanessa Redgrave deliver performances that would have received Oscar attention in a less incendiary film.
- Warner's film restoration here deserves to be compared with the all-time best.
- The newly reinstated footage completely changes the movie for the better.
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.