ESPN DeportesBates aprovecha el error de Andrews y se lleva a la zona de TD para los FalconsESPNFollow live: Defenses on top in tight Ravens-Falcons contestCNN TürkAntalya'da birlikte yaşadığı kadını öldüren şüpheli teslim olduPunchFalola warns social media weakens human relationships한겨레암살자(들), 국힘·극우 공격에도 300만 관객 돌파Inquirer‘Maleta boys’ to testify vs Romualdez in plunder bail hearingZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioThe Sydney Morning HeraldMoonee Ponds vendors reduce price hopes to sell $2,817,500 renovated homeLenta.ruЗеленский ввел новые санкции против российских физлиц и компаний경향신문“방랑시인 김병연의 문학 정신과 예술혼 기린다”···영월 김삿갓문화제 16일 개막매일경제이형일 “3조원 규모 해외건설 新전략펀드 신설…‘패키지 수주’ 지원”InfobaeEN VIVO América vs. Medellín HOY: comenzó el partido donde los ‘Diablos Rojos’ pueden clasificar a las finales
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 12, 2026

AI is less regulated than milk, says Microsoft president

Translate

Milk and washing machines are currently more regulated than AI, the president of Microsoft has said.

Brad Smith said there needed to be global safety rules in place, including a legal obligation to tell a "victim" if their system is breached by a rogue AI agent as well as deciding when outside evaluators should sign off on an AI product before it is released.

His comments put him at odds with President Donald Trump, who said the sector should regulate itself so US firms don't lose out to Chinese rivals.

But Smith said: "Right now, your washing machine is subject to more safety rules than AI. Every carton of milk that you see in the grocery store is subject to safety rules and inspection."

Demands for laws and rules to control AI have grown after experts in the sector said they believed the technology its a threat to humanity.

The bosses of the US-based AI giants such as Anthropic, OpenAI and Google DeepMind have all backed the idea of an AI development slowdown, but Trump has pushed against this.

Speaking to the BBC's Big Boss Interview, Smith called AI both a "tool and a weapon" that urgently needed to be regulated.

"Let's get started today," he said.

He said firms need "emergency brakes" – often known in the industry as 'kill switches' – to pause or slowdown AI if it got out of control in some way.

He also said there should be a legal requirement for firms to write "incident reports" and tell victims if the technology goes rogue. He also suggested that independent government evaluators should vet new AI technology.

"We know how to do this for other products," Smith said. "We should build on that knowledge and think about how to apply it to AI."

Smith said the UK was best placed to drive forward these global rules for AI because of its AI Security Institute, external, launched during former prime minister Rishi Sunak's government as the AI Safety Institute.

"In the world of technology, in the tech sector, most people that I know would say, if you ask them, name the country that is the leader in having this technical capability, they would say, it's very simple. It's the United Kingdom. They are the best."

Smith's views are very different to those of his president, who believes the US should be going full-steam ahead on AI.

Trump has repeatedly said that "whoever wins AI, wins".

However, Smith does not believe the US government would be as opposed to UK-led AI regulations as Trump's comments make it seem, suggesting the US would be more accepting of the UK making standards than the EU.

"In Washington DC, people don't look at the UK and they don't look at London the way they look at Brussels – that's a strength," he said.

"When you look at AI agents that have escaped human control, when you look at models that are so powerful that they're putting the world's cybersecurity at risk. I would say: The moment has arrived.

"Let's speak calmly, maybe even softly, but firmly, and start to bring people together. I hope that's the role we can play as a company. I hope that's the role the UK can play as a country."

View the original on BBC News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.