וואלהדיווח: צבא ארה"ב תקף שתי מכליות איראניותESPN DeportesPar de jonrones dan ventaja a Yankees en amanecer del juegoESPNCourt docs: Tiger plans to change plea in DUI caseThe Jerusalem PostSa'ar, Herzog meet officials from DRC in tie strengthening visit to Israel한겨레“군드릭 라마”…한국 병사 켄드릭 라마 곡 열창, 미국서도 화제SözcüBelediyenin suç örgütü şemasında Gökçek ilk sıradaInquirerWhy Central Luzon needs more than piecemeal flood projectsUOLJohn Ternus assume comando da Apple na era da IA e dos smartphones dobráveisLenta.ruМашины из 90-х неожиданно вызвали ажиотажный спрос на авторынкеThe Sydney Morning HeraldAlan Jones trial live updates: Hadley questioned over ‘secret contract’ to take over Jones’ 2GB breakfast radio slot as cross-examination continuesNTVSon dakika deprem mi oldu? Az önce deprem nerede oldu? İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir ve il il AFAD son depremler 02 Eylül 2026東洋経済オンラインなぜ?「コスパよく動こう」としているのに不思議と仕事が増える…要領の悪い人が気づかない"もう1つのコスト"のワナ | キャリア・教育 | 東洋経済オンライン
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

AMLC: Freeze order issued vs lawmaker’s assets

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — The Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) has secured a Court of Appeals order freezing 55 bank accounts and four insurance policies tied to an unnamed lawmaker associated with government projects worth billions of pesos.

In a statement, the AMLC said the freeze order also covered the assets of a construction company linked to the legislator and associated individuals.

The appellate court issued the order on Aug. 25 after finding probable cause that the assets were connected to violations of Republic Act 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.

A freeze order is a temporary measure intended to prevent assets suspected of being linked to unlawful activities from being used, transferred or disposed of while authorities pursue their case. It does not constitute a final forfeiture of the assets.

Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, the Court of Appeals may issue a freeze order upon a verified petition by the AMLC and a finding of probable cause.

The order may remain in effect for a period determined by the court but not exceeding six months if no case is filed against the account holder.

The AMLC said the case stemmed from investigations conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman and the Bureau of Internal Revenue, along with a separate administrative inquiry by the House of Representatives.

The lawmaker had claimed that he divested his interest in the construction business before assuming public office.

However, records showed that the legislator continued receiving proceeds from the business while serving in government, according to the AMLC. The agency said this indicated that he continued exercising control over the construction companies.

The AMLC did not identify the lawmaker, the construction company or the other individuals covered by the order. It also did not disclose the value of the frozen assets or provide a breakdown of their ownership.

View the original on The Philippine Star

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.