The Jerusalem PostSuspect in Jerusalem baby food contamination case named as Yan Shemlaוואלהבעקבות תקלת מים: אלפי תלמידים לא חזרו ללימודים בדרוםRTP DesportoInternacionais portugueses já movimentaram mais de 300 milhões no mercado de verãoEl Comercio“Sabe mucho”: José Serrano, el poderoso exministro de Correa acusado por el asesinato de Fernando VillavicencioBollywood HungamaAkshay Oberoi buys dream farmhouse in Karjat worth approx Rs 3 crores, calls it his ‘sanctuary’Inquirer EntertainmentElijah Canlas confirms split with Miles Ocampo, denies cheating allegationsCNN TürkYapay zeka yarışını farklı bir seviyeye taşıyacakComplete SportsDone Deal: Azeez Joins Brighton On Four-Year ContractDaily MaverickREEL SUCCESS STORIES: Calling a wrap on the gender gap: Mentoring makes movie magic for women in TVInquirerOver 11,000 classrooms damaged by habagat, cyclones — DepEdWirtualna PolskaGiertych w nowej roli. Prof. Migalski: To nie skruszy poparcia PiS-un-tvErmittlung in "zwei Richtungen": Verdacht auf "verfassungsfeindliche Sabotage" bei Umspannwerk nahe Köln
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Only P80M received so far from Leviste solar firm’s P24B fine – DOE

Translate
A House of Representatives panel will soon begin probing issues related to the franchise of Batangas Rep. Leandro Leviste’s solar
File photo shows Batangas Rep. Leandro Leviste giving journalists a tour of his 160-hectare solar power farm in Calatagan, Batangas.(INQUIRER / NIÑO JESUS ORBETA)

MANILA, Philippines — The government has received only P80 million, so far, from the P24 billion penalty imposed on Batangas 1st Dist. Rep. Leandro Leviste’s solar energy company, according to the Department of Energy (DOE) on Wednesday.

Energy Secretary Sharon Garin divulged this after Akbayan Partylist Rep. Chel Diokno raised the penalty issue during the House Committee on Appropriations’ budget hearing for the DOE on Wednesday.

The DOE recently imposed a P24 billion penalty against Leviste’s Solar Philippines Power Project Holdings Inc. (SPPHI) for supposedly failing to produce power it committed to deliver under more than 30 service contracts with the government.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Leviste’s solar energy firm slapped with P24-B fine

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

“P80 million, Mr. Chair,” Garin said when asked by Diokno about the amount the government received from the solar firm’s penalty.

When pressed on how the DOE plans to compel SPPHI to return the total P24 billion to the government, Garin said a criminal complaint has already been filed with the Department of Justice (DOJ), and a civil case has been lodged with the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG).

“The issue currently is in the hands of the DOJ… and then the OSG is handling the civil case,” said Garin. 

READ: DOE files complaint vs Leviste, 5 other solar firm execs

Article continues after this advertisement

“The purpose of these cases is also to recover the P14 billion in expired bonds, is that correct?” Diokno further asked, in which Garin answered in the affirmative.

Why not blacklist Solar PH?

Article continues after this advertisement

During the interpellation, Diokno also pressed whether the DOE has taken any steps to blacklist SPPHI.

Garin explained that since blacklisting or even suspension of companies was not included in the DOE’s circular, the agency recently issued guidelines regarding the blacklisting, pointing out that “we’re working on it.”

“I think a month or two months ago, we issued a new circular on GenCos’ (generation companies) accountability, which gives them three strikes, and we can blacklist them,” Garin said.

Diokno then requested the guidelines and pointed out that the solar firm must already be blacklisted, which the DOE vowed to comply with.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Leviste recently denied that SPPPHI failed to meet its targets, pointing out that projects were not actually granted permits to proceed. /gsg

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.