InquirerEasterlies to affect N. Luzon; localized thunderstorms to prevail over PHThe Jerusalem PostTrusting your audience: What NAZA could learn from Fauda's latest season - editorialESPN DeportesDodgers vence a Reds y asegura boleto a playoffs igualando récordESPNAlonso lauds Mets fans in 'special' return to Citi Fieldוואלההתרעות חירום הופעלו בכמה ערים בסעודיה, בהן ג'דה וינבוע한겨레색소폰 거장 조슈아 레드먼, 12년 만에 콰르텟 내한공연The Hollywood ReporterMost Memorable Moments at 2026 Emmys, From Taylor Swift’s Cameo to Mariska Hargitay Recreating Nicole Kidman’s AMC AdInquirer EntertainmentSexBomb Girls return to music with first new song in 20 yearsDaily MaverickWHAT WE’RE WATCHING: Fractured nation, fractured family: The politics and precarity of fatherhood in turbulent timesSözcüAvrupa’da alarm! Hava sahasına giren İHA, NATO savaş uçakları tarafından düşürüldüCNN Türk"İki milyar insanın su kaynağı bitiyor"UOLConrado Hübner Mendes critica privilégios no STF: "Ministro não precisa de penduricalho"
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Lucy Letby’s lawyer insists case has not been undermined after experts quit

Translate

WEST END FINAL

Lucy Letby’s lawyer has insisted her case has not been undermined after two experts quit her defence team, saying some of its arguments have “unresolvable problems”.

The former nurse, who maintains her innocence, is serving 15 whole-life terms for the murders of seven babies and the attempted murders of seven others while working on the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester hospital.

Engineering expert Helen Shannon and bioengineering professor Geoff Chase withdrew from the team on Monday.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, is considering evidence presented on her behalf by an international panel of medics.

The group argued the babies died or collapsed as a result of poor medical care and natural causes.

Asked by BBC Newsnight whether their withdrawal undermined Letby’s case, lawyer Mark McDonald said he “fundamentally” disagreed.

“They don’t know what I put into the CCRC because I haven’t told them. So how on earth could they make that conclusion?” he said. “But really, it comes back to this. Both sets of experts say that Lucy Letby is innocent.

“One set of experts remains in the CCRC. One set of experts have withdrawn. But they both are of the same position that whatever happened at the trial, what took place at the trial, was wrong, that the jury was misled.”

In a letter to the CCRC and reported by The Guardian, the two experts raised concerns about legal arguments put forward by Letby’s team, adding that it was “placing the long-term interests of Ms Letby at serious, unnecessary and unacceptable risk”.

The pair continued to back their report on Letby’s convictions for attempting to murder two babies with insulin, maintaining it was “very unlikely” they had been poisoned.

The letter added: “Whilst it is entirely legitimate for the defence to advance multiple arguments, some of the other arguments now being put forward we cannot support as scientifically credible and which have, in our view, fundamental unresolvable problems.”

Letby was denied permission to appeal against her convictions in 2024.

The findings of a public inquiry into how she was able to repeatedly kill and harm babies on the hospital’s neonatal unit are due to be published on Tuesday.

View the original on Evening Standard

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.